Exploring the Gartner UC Magic Quadrant for 2017

Who made the cut this year?

Exploring the Gartner UC Magic Quadrant for 2017

The Gartner Magic Quadrant for Unified Communications was officially unveiled this month for 2017, leaving many of the leading companies in the sector wondering whether they’d managed to make the cut. If you’re new to the Magic Quadrant, it’s simply an assessment by an analysis company, Gartner, based on evaluating UC companies according to their “completeness of vision”, and “ability to execute” new ideas.

Gartner UC MQ

Gartner Magic Quadrant for Unified Communications 2017

Though the Gartner Magic Quadrant is often considered to be a key indicator of the potential of companies in the UC space, it’s also worth noting that it’s a highly restrictive evaluation, that distils a huge industry into a consideration of 9 key vendors. Here, we’ll be looking at the players in Gartner’s UC magic quadrant, and asking whether the MQ really offers a complete view of the unified Comms market.

The Gartner UC Magic Quadrant

The Gartner Magic Quadrant works to separate 9 industry vendors from the Unified Communications sector, into four distinct categories. These are:

  • Leaders: Vendors that provide a full UC offering and powerful market presence. Leaders can show their success in the UC field, and deliver exceptional services to a broad range of enterprises
  • Challengers: Vendors that provide solutions that represent the ability to move into a leadership position, but may be lacking in various critical areas. Most challengers have strong solutions to offer but are lacking in market presence
  • Visionaries: Vendors that offer a different and strong approach to one or multiple core areas in unified communications. These vendors might have a limited ability to execute new ideas across all markets, which make it hard for them to enter the “leader” segment
  • Niche Players: Vendors that offer solutions particularly powerful in some UC areas, or have solutions with limited market reach

UC Today Market Guide 2018

UC Leaders

The leaders for this year’s UC Magic Quadrant were:

  • Cisco: Based in California, Cisco is known for offering a comprehensive range of UC solutions designed to span across cloud, on-premise, and hybrid options. Cisco also offers UCM for large enterprises with up to 80,000 users, helping to organise, simplify, and manage large, distributed workforces. Cisco also provides UCM as part of its cloud-based service portfolio, complemented by WebEx. For collaboration, Cisco offers its /unified-communications/ucaas creation, “Cisco Spark
  • Microsoft: A global company based in Washington, Microsoft offers a holistic view into UC under the Skype for Business The on-premise solution is the Skype for Business Server, while the cloud UC solution comes in the form of Skype for Business (SfB) online. The Skype for Business offering has proven itself to be an IP PBX replacement for a range of organisations. Microsoft continues to enhance the SfB portfolio today, forging new partnerships with companies like Creston, Logitech, and Polycom
  • Mitel: A publicly-traded global company based in Ottawa, Canada, Mitel offers UC through its “MiCollab” UC Suite, which aligns with a range of unique meeting solutions through its MiVoice telephony platforms. MiTeam features collaboration services for chat, document sharing, and group meetings. Mitel has a powerful presence within the virtualisation space and offers a range of unique delivery approaches for UC, combined with a significant base of new solutions deployed across virtual systems

UC Challengers

The challengers in the UC Magic Quadrant for 2017 are:

  • Huawei: A privately-owned company based in China, Huawei provides its customers with a wide range of communication services and products. For instance, the Huawei “eSpace” solution for Unified Communications supports presence, telephony, messaging, video collaboration, and more. The Huawei UC architecture is based on a virtualised platform called the “Unified Session Manager”, which allows the eSpace solution to run on a range of servers. Over the last year, Huawei has introduced public and private cloud deployment to the market, using the Unified Session Manager platform. The brand has also introduced a soft multipoint control unit to serve enterprises in search of scalable and flexible services
  • NEC: Based in Tokyo, Japan, NEC is a worldwide provider of communication and IT services. Its aim is to “empower the smart enterprise” with a versatile range of services and products. Today, NEC offers two UC options: Univerge SV9500, and Univerge 3C (U3C). The U3C solution provides a fully-integrated UC suite, based on service-oriented and web-oriented architecture and open standards, along with enterprise scalability, centralised administration, and security. The Univerge SV9500 has similar capabilities, with strengths in the world of hybrid time division multiplexing and IP

UC Visionaries

The visionaries for the UC Magic Quadrant in 2017 are:

  • Avaya: A privately held company in Santa Clara, California, Avaya is owned by private equity firms Silver Lake and TPG. Though Avaya filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in January 2017, it still offers an exceptional solution for unified communications. Avaya’s lead UC product is the Aura platform, which includes a Session Manager, Communication Manager, Presence services, and System Manager, as well as a range of Aura applications. Avaya Breeze and the Avaya Breeze Client SDK are the primary Avaya development platforms. Additionally, Zang Spaces provides workstream collaboration services
  • Unify: A subsidiary of Atos, a system integration, and outsourcing company, Unify is based in Munich, Germany, and offers the “Unify OpenScape” portfolio. This UC solution comes with a fully integrated suite of functionality solutions offered in three separate configurations, including OpenScape Enterprise for large organisations, OpenScape Enterprise Express for organisations with up to 5,000 users, and OpenScape Business for smaller companies. Unify OpenScape Fusion integration also allows for OpenScape to be embedded within other environments, including those offered by IBM, Microsoft, Google, and more

UC Niche Players

The niche players for the UC Magic Quadrant 2017 are:

  • ALE: Based in Paris, ALE operate under the Alcatel-Lucent Enterprise brand. ALE’s “OpenTouch suite” is its flagship solution for UC, available through the ALE partner network. The OTS provides a fully integrated and unified solution for UC that scales for up to 15,000 endpoints and 5,000 users. Over those limits, components can be deployed separately and as a single logical service for up to 20,000 users. Alcatel-Lucent Enterprise Rainbow is a cloud-based service offered by ALE, incorporating workstream collaboration services including presence, video, and voice conversation
  • ShoreTel: A publicly-traded company based in California, within the United States, ShoreTel competes in the UC market with “ShoreTel Connect“, a service with a consistent user interface across three distinct versions. Connect is available as a premises-based solution in Connect Onsite, a hybrid solution in Connect Hybrid, and a cloud solution in Connect Cloud. ShoreTel connect offers the UC services that most companies need, featuring telephony, peer-to-peer video, audio/video conferencing, and collaboration

[adace-ad id=”24392″]

Is the Magic Quadrant Really Fair?

GartnerIf the Magic Quadrant seems a little restricted from your perspective – that’s because it may well be too limiting for the UC sector. The Magic Quadrant is designed by big enterprises, for big enterprises, which means that if you’re looking for a comprehensive market assessment, you’ll need to look elsewhere.

In fact, the Quadrant’s approach to analysis is so controversial, that it has prompted numerous lawsuits, including a recent challenge by NetScout. According to NetScout, the Gartner report is not unbiased, objective, or independent. Instead, the Magic Quadrant features a pay-to-play business model that fails to consider those who don’t buy their way in.

We’ve questioned the nature of the Magic Quadrant in the past here at UC Today, as it’s hard to know whether the opinion of a company focused on boosting enterprise clients can be entirely trusted. In our opinion, there may be a need for deeper research when it comes to evaluating the top vendors of the day. What do you think?

Share your feelings and thoughts with us below and vote for your 2017 favourite vendor here:

Related:

Latest comments

9 Comments
The 2018 UC Gartner Magic Quadrant: Your Initially Glimpse - UpDate Tech News 02:07, 30 Jul 2018

[…] comparison to previous year’s MQ, we have seen some sizeable changes in management positions. So, we’re going to give you a whole […]

Reply to this comment
The 2018 UC Gartner Magic Quadrant: Your First Appear - Mashup Tech Blog 02:07, 30 Jul 2018

[…] compared to final year’s MQ, we’ve observed some important changes in management positions. So, we’re likely to give you a […]

Reply to this comment
The 2018 UC Gartner Magic Quadrant: Your To start with Appear - Global Cam Net 11:07, 30 Jul 2018

[…] compared to last year’s MQ, we’ve witnessed some important alterations in leadership positions. So, we’re going to give […]

Reply to this comment
The 2018 UC Gartner Magic Quadrant: Your 1st Appear - Mashup Tech Blog 10:07, 30 Jul 2018

[…] comparison to past year’s MQ, we’ve noticed some major improvements in leadership positions. So, we’re likely to give you a […]

Reply to this comment
DUNSTAN SPEETH 03:07, 27 Jul 2017

The exclusion of 8×8 and the other pure,cloud players is experienced in the inverse manner on UCaaS magic quadrants. So they are equally under represented across the spectrum.

Reply to this comment
Tony Watkins 08:07, 27 Jul 2017

Agree, and proves the UC Industry players and those UC services offered are well and truly blurred,making it even more confusing for Gartner’s MQ to stack up and differentiate let alone a new “buyer savvy” customer to understand.

Reply to this comment
Who really kicks UC-aaS? - CommsTrader 01:07, 26 Jul 2017

[…] Exploring the Gartner UC Magic Quadrant for 2017 […]

Reply to this comment
Ian Taylor 11:07, 26 Jul 2017

I suspect that Gartner’s Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria let them exclude the ‘new breed’ as I would call them, but perhaps this should change as the current MQ system is unfair to 1) The vendors that are excluded 2) (most importantly) End users looking for a UC solution.

Also, what about resellers looking for a UC vendor to add to their portfolio? Is it giving them a fair view of the current UC marketplace?

Reply to this comment
Rob Scott 11:07, 26 Jul 2017

Important to note that Gartner’s magic quadrant for unified communications excludes many key UC players. Taken from Gartner’s official page, this quadrant is exclusively on-premise vendors that offer mid-market and large enterprise platforms, therefore excluding many of the world’s leading vendors of UC software. E.g RingCentral, 8×8, Vonage and BroadSoft

The pure play cloud UC vendors are separated out into their own category. This is therefore not a fair picture of the UC landscape.

Maybe they need to re-name this quadrant to ‘On-Premise Unified Comms Magic Quadrant’.

Official MQ intro:

“This Magic Quadrant evaluates vendors of enterprise UC solutions that are intended for **on-premises** deployment by midsize and large organizations. Its assessments of nine vendors will help application leaders find the most suitable provider and solution for their needs.”

Source: https://www.gartner.com/doc/reprints?id=1-46VDGVD&ct=170719&st=sb

Reply to this comment

Please login to comment

Login

Related Articles