Can Better Integration Save Customer Trust? Xurrent Is Betting on It

60% of customers will actively seek an alternative provider after just three outages, according to new research commissioned by Xurrent, the service management platform.

For enterprise IT organizations and managed service providers, that number should be uncomfortable. The margin for error in repeat disruptions has narrowed, and the research suggests that something has shifted in how customers experience downtime.

Read More

• Exploring The IT Friction Tax – How Atera Helped Cut Unnecessary Labour
• Aryaka: How The Enterprise Network Can Unlock AI Success
• What is Negative Maintenance? The Internal Operating Principle That Cuts Future Workloads

In this article, we’ll explore how expectations for IT service management are rising, and how Xurrent is looking to address this head-on with upgrades to its integration offerings.

Why Are Customers Losing Patience With Repeat Outages?

Customers no longer treat a second or third outage as a one-off technical glitch. Xurrent’s 2026 research found that repeat disruptions trigger a “here we go again” response that compounds over time, making customers meaningfully more likely to consider switching providers.

The data points to a shift from technical impatience to something closer to emotional fatigue. It is not simply that outages are annoying, it is that repetition erodes trust in a way that a single incident does not. Once that trust is gone, customers stop giving the benefit of the doubt and start actively comparing alternatives.

Brian Wenngatz, CEO of Xurrent, highlights:

“The era of celebrating fast ticket fixes while systems keep breaking is officially over. Customers don’t care if you closed a support ticket in record time when the exact same system crashes again next week. Treating symptoms while ignoring the root cause is a fast track to lost revenue.”

That distinction, symptom versus root cause, is the thread that runs through everything else in this piece. A fast ticket resolution looks good on an internal dashboard. It means very little to a customer watching the same failure happen for a third time.

Why Does Gen Z Have the Least Patience for Outages?

Gen Z respondents expect immediate, automated communication during an outage at a far higher rate than the general population, and they lose trust faster than any other generation when that communication does not arrive.

According to the research, 65% of Gen Z respondents want immediate, automated responses during an outage, compared to 48% of the general population. A quarter of Gen Z respondents said they lose trust fastest when a company fails to provide updates during a disruption, compared to just 18% of Baby Boomers.

Across all age groups, 30% of respondents reported receiving zero useful information during their last service disruption, and 34% said they had to go hunting for updates themselves.

How Is Xurrent Addressing the Adoption Side of This Problem?

Xurrent’s new partnership with implementation specialist RennerBrown is built on the premise that a platform alone cannot fix root-cause problems if it is poorly configured or badly adopted, and that lasting fixes require the right people and processes, not just the right technology.

Under this partnership, RennerBrown’s engineers get hands-on with each customer’s actual day-to-day processes, configure Xurrent’s platform to match how that specific team really works, rather than a generic setup, and stick around well after the system goes live to make sure it keeps working as intended.

Bob Turek, President and Co-Founder at RennerBrown, explains the value:

“A great platform is just the starting point. What makes the difference is how it’s set up and run.”

Good implementation only goes so far if the underlying systems still can’t talk to each other. That is the second half of Xurrent’s answer.

How Does Xurrent’s New iPaaS Solve the Integration Problem?

Xurrent has just launched its iPaaS tool, a built-in integration platform now included in every subscription at no additional cost. It’s a new capability that lets customers connect Xurrent to other enterprise systems and automate workflows immediately, without relying on third-party tools or custom development.

The reasoning behind the launch centers on a simple problem: AI agents are only as useful as the systems they can actually reach. An agent that can flag an issue but cannot act on it is, in practice, an advisory tool rather than an operational one.

Xurrent points to an analysis of 847 enterprise AI deployments published by Harvard Business Review, which found that AI tools running alongside existing workflows fail at six times the rate of tools built directly into the work itself.

Brian Wenngatz summed up the logic behind the launch:

“Integration is the connective tissue that turns AI from advice into action. Without it, an AI agent is an expensive demo with nothing to act on.”

Xurrent iPaaS treats incidents, change requests, service catalogs, and CMDB records as first-class objects rather than generic data, and connects to systems such as ServiceNow, Jira, Okta, ClickUp, and Google Drive, among others.

Phil Christianson, Chief Product Officer at Xurrent, positioned the launch against how most ITSM vendors currently handle integration:

“Most vendors resell a generic integration platform and send customers a second bill to use it. Ours is native to Xurrent and purpose-built for ITSM, so it treats incidents, changes, and service requests as first-class work rather than generic data, and customers do not foot the bill for it separately.”

This lines up with a broader industry shift that independent voices in the space are pointing to as well.

Speaking to UC Today, Amit Barave, VP and GM of the Webex Suite and AI at Cisco, described the same underlying problem: enterprises have historically managed networking, security, and collaboration in silos, and AI only delivers full value once those silos are stitched together. He said:

“What used to be weeks-long operational troubleshooting and debugging tasks across multiple teams, we’re showing the promise of reducing that down to hours”

What Should Buyers Validate Before Trusting These Claims?

Buyers should treat “no additional cost” integration claims and implementation-partner promises as starting points for due diligence, not finished conclusions, and should test both under their own workflow conditions before committing.

What Does This Mean for Enterprise Buyers?

Customers have almost no patience left for repeat outages, and each new failure makes the “here we go again” reaction worse. Xurrent is tackling this from two angles: RennerBrown handles the human side, making sure the platform is set up and run properly, while the new iPaaS feature handles the technical side, making sure different systems can actually talk to each other.

But neither fix works on its own. Good setup and support don’t help much if the systems still can’t connect. And strong system connections don’t help if the platform was never configured properly in the first place.

Buyers looking at ITSM platforms should expect a vendor to solve both problems, not just the easier one to advertise.