It's been over a week since Sam Altman's return as OpenAI CEO, four days after being ousted by its board.
While it would be a stretch to say the dust has settled, events have certainly calmed down, giving fascinated onlookers time to reflect on the saga and what it might portend for OpenAI — and also its largest investor, Microsoft.
To recap as succinctly as possible, Altman was ousted as OpenAI CEO by its board on Friday, November 17. Following an indignant response from OpenAI investors and employees, Altman and the board discussed a potential return over the following weekend before discussions broke down. Microsoft then released a statement saying it had hired Altman and Brockman to manage an advanced AI research team overnight on Sunday, but this turned out to be premature.
Last Monday, a letter signed by over 700 of OpenAI's 770 employees demanded the board's resignations and Altman's return; otherwise, they would leave themselves to follow Altman to Microsoft. On Tuesday night Pacific Time, Altman was reinstated, the previous board was removed, and a new interim one was put into its place to oversee the hiring of the next permanent group.
Drama worthy of a prestige TV show, for sure, as Evan Kirstel, Social Media Strategist at BCStrategies, affirmed to UC Today.
"This is basically the season finale of Game of Thrones: AI edition," Kirstel said, "it's probably the most exciting boardroom drama since Steve Jobs was ousted from Apple all those years ago. in terms of melodrama, you couldn't ask for more."
But, like the best TV dramas, it's a story with meaningful themes as well as entertainment, as Craig Durr, Senior Analyst at Futurum Group, observed to UC Today.
"It highlights governance," Durr explained. "This is a very unique situation that has a 5013 public entity managing a for-profit business. And the path that took place to allow very quick decisions. If you think about it, the non-profit has a goal that says, 'We want to make AI safe', while a for-profit entity has a responsibility to shareholders to make money. You've got built-in governance issues from the top of the way this unique thing is organised."



