Smart glasses are arriving in the enterprise faster than legal frameworks can keep up. Employees wearing devices like Meta Ray-Ban glasses can capture continuous video, audio, and spatial data – often without colleagues or visitors knowing.
Speaking to UC Today, Fox Rothschild's Chief AI & Information Security Officer Mark McCreary called this a "minefield," adding that AI transcription errors compound the problem: inaccurate records of workplace conversations create their own disputes.
A Patchwork of Laws Creates Confusion
US wiretap law differs state by state. Between 11 and 13 states require two-party consent to record a conversation. An employer may believe they are operating in a one-party consent state, while the employee being recorded sits in Pennsylvania – which requires both parties to agree. McCreary warned that navigating these rules will become increasingly complex as wearable AI spreads through the workforce. European businesses face their own obligations under GDPR, but the US lacks any single federal standard.
Three Parties Can Share the Liability
McCreary identified three potential liability holders when a smart glasses recording goes wrong: the wearer, the manufacturer, and the employer. He argued employers have an obligation to prevent unauthorised recording in their workplaces – a point the Meta class action lawsuit is beginning to test in court.
