If you sell, implement, or advise on workplace technology, Human Capital Management (HCM) can feel like a fog of vendor claims. The practical problem isn’t spotting hype. Instead, it’s finding evidence that holds up in a budget meeting, a security review, and a change-management plan.
At the discovery stage, enterprise buyers want clear answers to the same questions: what HCM solves, where ROI shows up, why investment is rising now, and how HCM connects to recruitment software, onboarding tools, HRIS integration, and the full talent lifecycle. They also want to know where collaboration and UC fit. As a result, onboarding, enablement, and employee self-service now sit closer to the flow of work.
This guide curates the most credible HCM industry reports and human capital research shaping the market right now. It also includes practical takeaways for UC Today readers.
Related Articles
- Building Culture, Capability, and Change with Human Capital Management
- The Workforce Metric Gap That’s Costing You Millions: How Predictive People Analytics Turns HR Data Into Action
Quick definition (for search clarity): HCM covers the systems and processes that run the employee lifecycle. That includes recruitment, onboarding, HRIS/core HR, payroll and benefits, learning, performance, workforce planning, and people analytics. It also includes the governance that makes workforce data reliable.
What Counts as “Credible” HCM Research?
Not all “research” is created equal. In this roundup, credible means the report comes from one of the groups below. It also means the report makes its methodology or context clear.
Independent analysts and consultancies with clear framing (for example, Deloitte) help when you need enterprise patterns. They also help when you want operating-model signals and real workforce examples. In short, they are not product marketing.
“Leading only for business outcomes isn’t leadership: it’s an algorithm… And leading only for human outcomes isn’t leadership either: it’s conservatorship or guardianship.”
— Deloitte, 2025 Global Human Capital Trends (p.5)
Finance and sector specialists with market sizing and deal analysis (for example, ICON Corporate Finance) help when you test market direction. For example, they can show consolidation signals and where buyers pay premium value. They also show which “foundation” capabilities investors see as sticky.
“Recent M&A trends reflect a push for efficiency in talent acquisition, integrated solutions in Core HR, and enhanced engagement in talent management.”
— ICON Corporate Finance, HCM Sector Report (Oct 2025 update, p.19)
Regulatory and policy sources that shape buying rules also matter. For example, EU AI Act guidance influences what HR, legal, security, and IT teams accept as “safe” AI use in employment workflows.
Finally, enterprise-grade studies that link findings to operational outcomes are valuable. They help when you need evidence tied to retention, safety, compliance, and productivity. For instance, Firstup’s nursing study is a strong example.
“There is so much communication and too many overwhelming emails sent out that, when something important goes out, it gets overlooked.”
— Firstup, State of Nursing Communication (Jan 2026, p.4)
Why Is the HCM Market Growing Now?
One clear signal shows HCM is moving beyond “HR software.” For many buyers, finance and sector analysts now describe it as people infrastructure. In that view, HCM links workforce decisions to business outcomes. It connects hiring, onboarding, development, and mobility to delivery capacity, productivity, retention, and compliance.
ICON Corporate Finance sizes the global HCM technology market at $28.8bn. It projects more than 13% CAGR through 2028 and expects the market to reach $47.5bn by 2028E. The drivers match what many leaders see today: hybrid work complexity, higher compliance needs, AI-enabled automation, and demand for better workforce insight.
“Recent M&A trends reflect a push for efficiency in talent acquisition, integrated solutions in Core HR, and enhanced engagement in talent management.”
— ICON Corporate Finance, HCM Sector Report (Oct 2025 update, p.19)
In buyer terms, the message is simple: HCM is infrastructure you build on. It is not a set of separate HR tools you bolt together.
Discovery-stage buyers test this with outcome-first questions. First, they ask which outcomes matter most right now. That could mean time-to-hire, ramp time, retention, or compliance. Next, they ask which data must be reliable to defend ROI. That often includes workforce KPIs, skills signals, and internal mobility visibility. Finally, they ask what a “minimum viable foundation” looks like. They want that before advanced analytics or AI can add value.
What Do M&A and Valuations Reveal About HCM ROI?
Market growth shows demand. Meanwhile, deal activity shows what vendors and investors value most. ICON notes HCM M&A has averaged roughly 50 transactions per quarter over the past two years. As a result, consolidation pushes toward end-to-end hire-to-retire platforms. These systems aim to cover the full employee lifecycle. They also go beyond single point solutions.
ICON also reports that Core HR platforms trade at a premium. The median is 6.0x EV/LTM revenue. Core HR is the foundation layer. It includes employee records, payroll, benefits, compliance workflows, and baseline reporting integrity.
“Core HR platforms” trade at a premium (median “6.0x EV/LTM revenue”).
— ICON Corporate Finance, HCM Sector Report (Oct 2025 update, p.19)
That valuation signal matters for ROI because it points to where “safe value” tends to start. Buyers get steady returns when foundations stay stable. They need consistent records, clean reporting, and reliable payroll. In addition, they need strong compliance and auditability. Once teams trust the basics, analytics and AI are more likely to drive outcomes. They won’t just create dashboards that no one uses.
Discovery-stage buyers can use this to avoid a common mistake. Don’t buy platform ambition before you fix data integrity. Start with the baseline. For example, look at compliance exceptions, payroll errors, HR case volume, and rework. Then define which integrations you need for trusted reporting. That often spans HRIS, ATS, identity, and finance.
Why Are Skills-Based Models Becoming the Default?
Across human capital research, one theme keeps coming up: organisations are moving from job-based models to skills-based models. Deloitte’s Global Human Capital Trends helps here. It frames workforce challenges as tensions to manage. It does not frame them as binary choices. Those tensions include augmentation vs automation and outcomes vs outputs.
“Navigating these tensions isn’t about picking a side. It’s about finding a balance.”
— Deloitte, 2025 Global Human Capital Trends (p.5)
For discovery-stage readers, the key point is simple. “Skills” now means more than job titles and certifications. Many organisations include technical skills, human capabilities, and potential. Some also include experiences, aspirations, traits, and motivations.
Deloitte’s examples are useful. Johnson & Johnson is described as moving toward a “whole-person” model. Medtronic, working with InStride, is cited for shifting some IT roles away from degree requirements. The wider point is that degrees do not always map to job readiness.
This matters to recruitment software and onboarding tools. Skills-based models change how firms define “fit.” As a result, recruiting shifts toward skills matching and role flexibility. Meanwhile, onboarding becomes a readiness exercise, not just a checklist. Learning becomes more targeted and measurable. In turn, internal mobility becomes easier to activate when skills data can surface options.
Discovery-stage buyers should treat skills data as a foundation problem first. For example, they ask where skills data lives today. It might sit in the ATS, HRIS, LMS, or spreadsheets. Or it might not exist in a reliable form at all. They also ask how to validate skills data before they automate decisions. Finally, they test if skills data can work across the lifecycle. They don’t want it trapped in one module.
Is AI in HCM More About Adoption Than Algorithms?
In many HCM deployments, AI doesn’t fail because the model is “bad.” It fails because people don’t adopt it. They may not trust it. They may not know how to use it in daily work. Therefore, workforce AI research often treats success as a readiness and experience problem, not a tooling checklist.
Vendors now position AI as part of core workflows. They focus on employee self-service, manager support, and HR service delivery. They don’t only push bolt-on analytics. Oracle’s Fusion Cloud HCM positioning is one example of this “AI inside the workflow” shift.
“Our embedded AI is built in, not bolted on, giving you a single platform with one data model and one security framework…”
— Oracle, Fusion Cloud HCM Solution Overview (p.7)
A practical test helps at the discovery stage. Replace “Does it have AI?” with “Will people use it?” Buyers can check if it removes friction in HR and manager workflows. They can also check if leaders can explain outcomes. If the system feels like a black box, adoption drops. Buyers should also ask for signs of real usage, not feature breadth.
That leads to better early questions. For example, which workflows will AI touch first? Common starting points include recruiting, HR case management, scheduling, and learning. Buyers should also ask how teams will measure adoption. This might include usage rates, time saved, case deflection, and manager satisfaction. They should also ask about guardrails. Those include explainability, audit logs, bias testing, and approval paths.
Why Governance and Trust Are Now HCM Buying Criteria
Workforce platforms hold sensitive data. That includes pay, performance signals, wellbeing inputs, learning history, and manager feedback. As AI expands into recruitment, performance, and internal mobility, governance becomes a discovery requirement. HR, IT, legal, and security teams all need confidence.
The EU AI Act treats AI used in employment contexts as high-risk. As a result, demand rises for explainability, auditability, and controls. Buyers need to show how systems make decisions and how they manage risk.
Governance also links to ROI because it protects adoption. If employees and managers don’t trust the system, adoption drops. When adoption drops, the ROI case fails. If leaders can’t explain AI outputs, they stop using them. That can happen even when the feature exists.
Discovery-stage governance questions often start with minimum bars. For example, buyers ask what “good enough” looks like for audit trails, access controls, explainability, and bias testing. They ask if the system can produce evidence for auditors without manual work. They also ask who owns governance across HR, IT, legal, data, and security. Finally, they ask how those teams coordinate.
What Do HCM Case Studies Say About Communication and Enablement?
One discovery-useful case study is the Firstup State of Nursing Communication study. It links communication failures to measurable operational risk. It reports that 90% learned about policy changes after they took effect. It also reports that 86% of hospitals rely on email and 25% still use paper notices. The study also says 81% of nurses link patient care issues to miscommunication. It also flags retention pressure and cost. 32% considered leaving their unit, and the study cites a $61,110 average cost to replace an RN.
“Bottom line: When nurses miss critical communications, the impact shows up where leaders feel it most: cost, compliance, and quality of care.”
— Firstup, State of Nursing Communication (Jan 2026, p.2)
This belongs in an HCM reports roundup because message fatigue and poor targeting are not “soft topics.” Instead, they show up as retention risk, compliance risk, and operational risk. In clinical settings, they also affect patient care.
For UC Today readers, the takeaway is clear. HCM now overlaps with workplace enablement. Onboarding, self-service, and daily work sit closer to collaboration tools. As HCM vendors meet employees where they work, the boundary between HR workflows and UC workflows keeps shrinking. In practice, role-based onboarding content may live inside collaboration apps. Employee self-service may route through chat. Frontline communication can become a measurable lever for retention and compliance.
How Should Buyers Use These HCM Reports at the Start of a Journey?
Early-stage buyers don’t need a perfect vendor shortlist. Instead, they need questions tied to outcomes, data trust, adoption, and governance.
A simple sequence helps. First, define the primary outcome you want to improve. That could be time-to-hire, onboarding speed, retention, or compliance confidence. Next, identify which data must be reliable for that outcome. This often includes skills data, workforce KPIs, and internal mobility visibility. Then decide where adoption will happen. Will it happen in an HR portal, or in the flow of work through collaboration tools? That choice shapes enablement and long-term usage.
From there, build an ROI proof plan that finance will accept. Start with baseline metrics. Then track them each quarter after deployment. Finally, set governance minimums upfront. Cover audit trails, access controls, explainability, and bias testing. This prevents delays later.
If you’re evaluating recruitment software, onboarding tools, HRIS integration, or a broader HCM platform, the same logic applies: outcomes first, data trust second, adoption third, governance always.
What the Best HCM Reports Agree On
Across the most credible HCM market research, the signals are converging. HCM is becoming workforce infrastructure. Market growth and consolidation support that shift. Skills-based strategy is moving toward default. AI value depends on adoption in real workflows. Governance and trust now shape buying decisions. For UC Today readers, HCM overlaps more with workplace enablement each year. Onboarding, communications, and work happen inside collaboration environments.
Subscribe to UC Today for weekly workplace tech research and buyer guidance.
FAQs
What are HCM industry reports, and why do they matter?
HCM industry reports come from consultancies, analysts, finance groups, and regulators. They track how the HCM market changes. As a result, they help buyers understand what is shifting, what drives investment, and which outcomes to prioritise.
What does human capital management include across the talent lifecycle?
HCM spans recruitment software, onboarding tools, HRIS/core HR, payroll and benefits, learning and development, performance management, workforce planning, and people analytics. It also includes governance controls that keep workforce data reliable.
What are the strongest signals in HCM market research right now?
Strong growth and consolidation are clear signals. ICON projects the HCM tech market growing from $28.8bn (2024E) to $47.5bn (2028E). In addition, it reports sustained deal activity.
Why is HRIS integration important when adopting HCM platforms?
Disconnected systems weaken reporting and reduce trust in data. They also raise compliance risk and make ROI harder to prove. Therefore, integration improves workflow consistency, analytics reliability, and governance readiness.
What makes an HCM case study credible?
Credible case studies show baseline metrics, a clear intervention, and measurable outcomes. Examples include reduced time-to-hire, faster onboarding, or lower attrition. Firstup’s research links workforce communication breakdowns to retention and operational costs.
