Is Poor Communication Costing You More Than You Think?

Why inefficient communication undermines growth for enterprises

3
poor workplace communication
Security, Compliance & RiskUnified Communications & CollaborationExplainer

Published: January 15, 2026

Tom Walker

Poor workplace communication rarely shows up on balance sheets, but its impact is felt in every corner of your company. It doesn’t always show up as a single failure. More often, it shows up as a pattern: decisions that take too long, projects that drift, and teams that spend more time clarifying than creating. 

For leaders navigating remote and hybrid work, the stakes are higher. When team communication depends on digital channels, inefficient communication becomes an operational issue, not just a cultural one. And the cost isn’t just lost time – it can reshape execution, accountability, and growth. 

The Real Cost of Inefficient Communication 

The most expensive part of poor workplace communication is the work nobody planned to do – chasing updates, rebuilding context, redoing tasks, and resolving misunderstandings in business after they’ve already created downstream impact. In hybrid environments, digital friction compounds quickly. 

A common culprit is tool sprawl. When information is split across email threads, chat apps, meeting notes, and project boards, people spend time “triangulating the truth” instead of moving work forward. The result is slower decisions, lower throughput, and inconsistent execution. 

How Poor Workplace Communication Undermines Growth 

Executives often feel the impact as decision latency – approvals stall, priorities get re-litigated, and teams hesitate because they’re unclear on what’s current. In practice, inefficient communication creates three predictable problems: 

Context collapses: Decisions get made in one channel, while execution happens in another. 

Ownership blurs: When responsibilities aren’t explicit, accountability becomes optional. 

Signals get noisy: People over-communicate “just in case,” which makes critical updates easier to miss. 

This is where reducing miscommunication becomes strategic. It’s not just about clearer writing or better meeting etiquette. It’s about building an environment where decisions, documentation, and delivery stay connected. 

Remote Work Has Raised the Stakes 

Remote and hybrid work models haven’t created communication problems – but they’ve made existing ones harder to ignore. Without those day-to-day office interactions, teams depend almost entirely on digital channels to stay aligned. When those channels are fragmented or inconsistently used, poor communication becomes more visible. 

 Misunderstandings Don’t Stay Internal 

Poor communication is often treated as an internal productivity issue, but it can leak into the customer experience through slower resolution times, inconsistent information, and avoidable escalation loops. 

In fact, significant percentages of companies link poor collaboration experiences to reduced productivity and harm to customer experiences. If internal team communication is fragmented, customer-facing teams struggle to get fast answers from subject matter experts, and the customer pays the price. 

For organisations with contact centres or customer support functions, communication gaps become especially costly when internal and external conversations live in different worlds.  

Disengagement and Staff Turnover 

Poor workplace communication also shows up as emotional friction. When employees can’t access information easily, don’t know where decisions live, or feel excluded from key context, employee engagement drops. That can create a slow slide toward attrition – making reducing staff turnover harder, particularly in competitive talent markets. 

This matters for executives because turnover costs are rarely limited to recruitment. They include onboarding time, lost institutional knowledge, and a temporary hit to team performance while roles are refilled. 

Reducing Miscommunication Starts with Simplicity 

Reducing miscommunication doesn’t require more tools. In many cases, it requires fewer – but better connected – ones. Unified environments that bring messaging, meetings, voice, and collaboration into a single experience reduce the mental overhead of switching platforms. Employees know where conversations happen, where decisions are captured, and where work progresses. 

Looking Ahead 

Poor communication may be easy to overlook, but its impact is anything but subtle. Left unaddressed, it contributes to productivity loss, disengagement, and stalled growth. 

For organisations considering an update to their communications approach, recognising the cost of inefficient communication is the first step toward building a more connected, resilient, and productive workplace. 

Find out how Unified Communications can simplify teamwork in our comprehensive guide to UC.  

Call RecordingCommunication Compliance​Internal Comms Platforms​
Featured

Share This Post