As someone who’s witnessed the transformational power of unified communications firsthand, I’m fascinated by how AI has amplified both our productivity and our problems. If you’re an IT leader or compliance professional trying to balance innovation with risk management, this article explores the uncomfortable reality we all face: smarter conversations are creating elevated risk challenges.
The numbers tell a compelling story. OpenAI’s ChatGPT has reached 400 million monthly active users—matching Microsoft’s entire corporate Teams user base—and that figure doubled in just six months. Meanwhile, Microsoft Copilot and Zoom AI Companion are embedding deeper into enterprise workflows, generating meeting summaries, chat responses, and inserting AI content into documents, spreadsheets and more, faster than compliance teams can govern them.
But here’s what keeps me optimistic: organizations that embrace proactive AI governance aren’t just managing risk; they’re unlocking sustainable innovation. The question isn’t whether to enable these tools, but how to do it intelligently.
The Rise of Shadow AI: A Familiar Challenge with New Complexity
“We’re seeing the same patterns we’ve dealt with in shadow IT and unauthorized messaging apps, but the AI use case is much more immature in how firms are addressing it,” explains Garth Landers, Director of Global Product Marketing at Theta Lake.
“Organizations are still trying to figure this out and play catch up using the same strained resources they’re already using for communications infrastructure.”
The shadow AI phenomenon mirrors what we’ve experienced with collaboration tools, but with added complexity. Employees aren’t trying to be malicious, they’re seeking productivity gains. They hear about a “pretty cool tool” that can accelerate their work, and they want to avoid being left behind. The challenge for IT and compliance teams is not just that well-intentioned users may copy and paste sensitive information into unauthorized platforms. It is that legacy compliance systems often lack the infrastructure needed for forensic-level inspection and governance of AI-generated communications (aiComms).
“You poll the audience at regulated organization webinars, and 70% of them have turned off AI features because they don’t know how to deal with issues like validating the data or identifying misuse,” Landers notes.
“They’re saying ‘I don’t know how to deal with this, so I’m not going to.'”
This reactive approach—disabling innovation to avoid risk—isn’t sustainable. IT leaders are being charged with enhancing productivity gains- not throttling them. Organizations that take this path are essentially choosing operational safety over competitive advantage, and their employees will inevitably find workarounds.
Beyond Basic Archiving: What Smarter Compliance Actually Looks Like
Traditional capture-and-archive approaches weren’t designed for AI-generated content. When your meeting summaries, chat responses, and prompt interactions are automatically generated and dispersed across Teams, Zoom, RingCentral and third-party applications, basic archiving becomes inadequate.
Smart compliance requires four fundamental shifts in thinking. First, you need direct API integration with AI tools to capture data at the source. Theta Lake’s approach of working directly with platforms like Microsoft Copilot and Zoom AI Companion ensures you’re not trying to retrofit governance onto systems that weren’t designed for it.
Second, you need granular policy controls that go beyond retention and can identify a number of risk laden scenarios when they occur. Modern AI governance platforms should identify confidential data, material non-public information, and PII within AI-generated content. They should be able to create custom rules to flag user prompts about inappropriate topics or detect when users are sharing sensitive information with AI tools.
Third, you need to have visibility into how users are using (or abusing) these AI systems. Even if the behavior isn’t necessarily a regulatory or privacy issue, it is certainly one of governance. Users looking up personal details of clients or fellow employees is one example of a governance problem that you need to manage.
Fourth, and most importantly, you need forensic level data protection, including proactive remediation capabilities. When sensitive data is identified in a summary or transcript that’s available organization-wide, you need the ability to remove the content, or redact it, notify users, and provide training resources such as policy guidelines—not just document the violation for later review.
Balancing Innovation with Risk: The Sanctioned Alternative Strategy
The most successful organizations aren’t trying to eliminate AI usage, they’re channelling it into secure, compliant environments. “Saying no can actually exacerbate the problem,” Landers emphasizes.
“You can’t stamp out user demand, so you have to offer sanctioned alternatives and make it clear that going outside organizational boundaries with confidential information is a policy violation.”
This strategy requires clear communication about what tools are approved and why. If you’re offering an in-house sanctioned LLM trained on your data, you need to explain how it’s superior to external alternatives while establishing clear consequences for policy violations.
The Volume Challenge: Managing AI-Generated Data at Scale
One of the most underestimated aspects of AI governance is the sheer volume of data these tools generate. Every meeting now produces not just a recording and transcript, but also potential summaries, action items, sentiment analysis, and metadata. Microsoft’s recent addition of screen recording to Intelligent Recap adds another data layer to govern.
“Organizations are facing this now,” Landers explains. “If I’m a compliance team member, I’ve been asked to say yes to Teams, yes to Zoom, yes to everything else over the last few years. Now I’ve got AI-generated content landing on top of that without the necessary organizational maturity around it.”
This volume challenge requires automation and intelligent prioritization. You can’t and shouldn’t need to manually review every AI-generated summary, but you can use risk detection algorithms to flag content that requires human attention and make sure the guardrails you’re putting in place for data protection, such as limiting AI access to certain content sources, are working. The key is creating workflows that scale with your data volume while maintaining oversight of high-risk interactions.
Looking Ahead: Future-Proofing Your AI Governance Strategy
The AI landscape will continue evolving rapidly. We’re only in version one or two of these capabilities, and vendors like Microsoft and Zoom are releasing new features monthly. Organizations need governance approaches that solve today’s problems while adapting to tomorrow’s innovations.
Theta Lake’s new AI Governance and Inspection Suite addresses this challenge by offering modular solutions for specific platforms and use cases. Rather than requiring organizations to rip up existing compliance infrastructure, it provides dedicated modules for Zoom AI Companion, Microsoft Copilot, and note-taker bot detection that enable integration with existing workflows or newly created workflows dedicated to AI content.
“You shouldn’t be looking to start over just because you’re introducing a new content engine into the organization,” Landers notes. “It’s about making sure AI governance can fit into what you’re doing and choosing an approach that can adapt to what you’re doing.”
The Path Forward: Enabling Innovation Through Smart Governance
For compliance leaders and IT professionals tackling these challenges, the path forward requires both short-term tactical decisions and long-term strategic thinking. In the immediate term, you need to identify which AI tools to sanction, establish clear policies around their use, and implement governance technologies that integrate with your existing infrastructure, while providing deep visibility, inspection and control over AI-generated content across platforms.
The longer-term strategy involves building organizational maturity around AI governance, developing policies that will evolve with regulatory requirements, and selecting technology partners that can adapt as AI capabilities advance.
The organizations that get this right won’t just manage AI compliance, they’ll gain a competitive advantage by enabling their teams to innovate safely. As AI becomes more embedded in our daily work, the ability to harness these tools while maintaining security and compliance will separate industry leaders from followers.
Smart conversations don’t have to mean compromised systems. With the right governance approach, they can mean both enhanced productivity and strengthened compliance. The key is acting now, before the complexity overwhelms your ability to respond effectively.
The future of work is undeniably AI-enhanced. The question is whether your organization will lead that transformation or be forced to catch up. Choose your governance partner wisely, the next 12-18 months will define how successfully you navigate this critical transition.
Compliance is King for Enterprises
Read more of our insightful articles on compliance in unified communications and collaboration:
